Response to Chandler’s attorneyCourt records indicate that Chandler sold his portion to Dr. Mells on April 1, 1994 and stuck his former wife Nathalie with a tax bill of $21,952
Appears the Chandlers were trying to avert the courts decision to have the case adjudicated by a 3 judge panel by filing for Jordan in a different jurisdiction
In my opinion Chandler wanted this case tried in open court with cameras present – in the hopes Jackson would be pressured into settling.
So, this means that Jordy himself sued MJ after he was an adult? This is wired because the whole defense for MJ is that Evan had an agenda of extorting money from MJ, not his son. Does anybody else think that way?
So, this means that Jordy himself sued MJ after he was an adult? This is wired because the whole defense for MJ is that Evan had an agenda of extorting money from MJ, not his son. Does anybody else think that way?